Banks scrutinised for offloading deal contingent risks on to funds
Critics say practice could lead to disclosure of sensitive client data
Banks offering deal contingent hedges are divided over whether it is appropriate to offload the risk of the underlying transactions falling through on to hedge funds.
Market participants say that although the practice has been around for years it has become increasingly necessary, as higher volatility places a strain on banks’ capacity to take on deal contingent client trades. Not every bank offloads risk in this way, and FX Markets understands that only a handful of deal contingent trades
More on Trading
Chinese corporates shunned hedging during tariff upheaval
High hedging costs and increasingly stable spot rate meant exporters opted not to add FX hedges as RMB rose
For variation margin payments, cash is no longer king
Dealers are being pressed to accept corporate bonds and even equities as collateral for non-cleared trades
BNP Paribas eyes selective algo white label tie-ups
The French bank struck its first FX algo white-labelling partnership with Lloyds
Will Taiwan lifers ramp up FX hedging amid tariff convulsions?
As TWD remains strong against the US dollar, Taiwanese life insurers are still poised to act
Macro traders tread carefully ahead of tariff pause deadline
Uncertainty has held buy-siders back from both hedging and directional trades
Hedge funds return to HKD carry trade after May stop-outs
Widened interest rate differentials spur investors to re-enter positions, but risks remain
Why asset owners aren’t turning their backs on America (yet)
Pension and sovereign wealth investors see US exceptionalism outlasting policy-driven turmoil
Limited-loss hedges help US firms dodge costly FX moves
Structurers say US corporates’ use of options-based net investment hedging helped soften impact of USD selloff
