In favour of the Treasury’s proposed exemption

trenner

In contrast to the US Treasury's tightly argued paper justifying an exemption from mandatory central counterparty (CCP) clearing for FX swaps and forwards, Stanford University professor Darrell Duffie's rebuttal is full of vagueness, impression and lacunas.

This is typified by his declaration that he has "not seen any effective argument concerning why FX markets should be exempted from Dodd-Frank requirements that are unrelated to clearing". Yet the Treasury paper addresses only one part of the

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact customer services - www.fx-markets.com/static/contact-us, or view our subscription options here: https://subscriptions.fx-markets.com/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@fx-markets.com to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to FX Markets? View our subscription options

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a FX Markets account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an indvidual account here: